I purchased a set of magnetic eyelashes from Enjuvie after seeing an advertisement on Instagram. Their website prominently advertised a “Risk-Free 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee,” which led me to believe I could try the product and return it if I was not satisfied. However, after attempting to use the product, I found it to be uncomfortable, heavy, and painful to wear. When I reached out to their customer service to request a refund, they denied my request, stating that their return policy does not cover issues related to “personal preference or comfort.”
Deceptive and Contradictory Return Policy:
Upon reviewing their refund policy, I found contradictions and misleading terms that make it nearly impossible for a customer to receive a refund:
1. Unclear Risk-Free Guarantee: The company’s marketing suggests a hassle-free return policy, but in reality, they refuse refunds for comfort-related issues, which is not clearly disclosed at the time of purchase.
2. Impossible Return Conditions: Their policy states that returns are only accepted if the item is unworn and unused, yet they also require customers to make a “genuine effort” to apply the lashes before requesting a refund. This creates an unfair loophole where customers must try the product but then become ineligible for a refund because it is no longer “unused.”
3. Vague Refund Criteria: The company selectively determines eligibility for refunds on a case-by-case basis, allowing them to deny most claims under the guise of “application-related concerns.”
Why This is Fraudulent:
• The company misrepresents its return policy by marketing it as a risk-free 30-day trial while burying key exclusions in fine print.
• The terms make it impossible to meet refund criteria, forcing customers to keep a product they cannot use.
• Their advertising is deceptive, luring in consumers with false guarantees.
Useful
Reply
Enjuvie Contacts
If you know any contact information for Enjuvie, help other victims by adding it!
These people knew all my credit information and credit cards, mortgage information, my credit balances, credit card numbers. They told me I was being...Apr 23, 2026
I was messaged, by name, about a property I haven't owned in over 10 years. It was a very vague message that would make most people contact them for clarification.Apr 23, 2026
Received 2 text messages stating my TD bank N.A. account with LVNV was sold to Halsted Financial and that I can pay them about 2k to pay it off. I...Apr 23, 2026
Got an email stating that I was a potential candidate for a data entry position paying $27 per hour. Sent a link for an assessment. Next received...Apr 23, 2026
I was contacted by email about a job I applied to on LinkedIn, they set up a Microsoft meet and conducted the interview, after questioning I received...Apr 23, 2026
This is the 3rd and final attempt to contact Andrew Cariardo. Reference the case file number 2026-35093. My name is Dennis and I'm contacting...2 Reports
I received a call from 916-239-2090. A message was left by an automated voice: "Need for, ********. I am calling on behalf of document delivery...49 Reports
Deceptive and Contradictory Return Policy:
Upon reviewing their refund policy, I found contradictions and misleading terms that make it nearly impossible for a customer to receive a refund:
1. Unclear Risk-Free Guarantee: The company’s marketing suggests a hassle-free return policy, but in reality, they refuse refunds for comfort-related issues, which is not clearly disclosed at the time of purchase.
2. Impossible Return Conditions: Their policy states that returns are only accepted if the item is unworn and unused, yet they also require customers to make a “genuine effort” to apply the lashes before requesting a refund. This creates an unfair loophole where customers must try the product but then become ineligible for a refund because it is no longer “unused.”
3. Vague Refund Criteria: The company selectively determines eligibility for refunds on a case-by-case basis, allowing them to deny most claims under the guise of “application-related concerns.”
Why This is Fraudulent:
• The company misrepresents its return policy by marketing it as a risk-free 30-day trial while burying key exclusions in fine print.
• The terms make it impossible to meet refund criteria, forcing customers to keep a product they cannot use.
• Their advertising is deceptive, luring in consumers with false guarantees.