I purchased a set of magnetic eyelashes from Enjuvie after seeing an advertisement on Instagram. Their website prominently advertised a “Risk-Free 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee,” which led me to believe I could try the product and return it if I was not satisfied. However, after attempting to use the product, I found it to be uncomfortable, heavy, and painful to wear. When I reached out to their customer service to request a refund, they denied my request, stating that their return policy does not cover issues related to “personal preference or comfort.”
Deceptive and Contradictory Return Policy:
Upon reviewing their refund policy, I found contradictions and misleading terms that make it nearly impossible for a customer to receive a refund:
1. Unclear Risk-Free Guarantee: The company’s marketing suggests a hassle-free return policy, but in reality, they refuse refunds for comfort-related issues, which is not clearly disclosed at the time of purchase.
2. Impossible Return Conditions: Their policy states that returns are only accepted if the item is unworn and unused, yet they also require customers to make a “genuine effort” to apply the lashes before requesting a refund. This creates an unfair loophole where customers must try the product but then become ineligible for a refund because it is no longer “unused.”
3. Vague Refund Criteria: The company selectively determines eligibility for refunds on a case-by-case basis, allowing them to deny most claims under the guise of “application-related concerns.”
Why This is Fraudulent:
• The company misrepresents its return policy by marketing it as a risk-free 30-day trial while burying key exclusions in fine print.
• The terms make it impossible to meet refund criteria, forcing customers to keep a product they cannot use.
• Their advertising is deceptive, luring in consumers with false guarantees.
Useful
Reply
Enjuvie Contacts
If you know any contact information for Enjuvie, help other victims by adding it!
This “company” just tried to scam a verified victim of device compromise and identity theft by claiming they were acting on behalf of Verizon...9 h ago
I made a purchase on pupapaws.com for a pet toy, but 5 days after, I was charged $39.99 for a “VIP membership” that I did not knowingly sign up for...19 h ago
David Hagelberg with agent ID and everything, said my recent loan request needs revenue verification before the file expires? I've not needed nor...20 h ago
ordered flight sim g1000 , came with no instructions and bits missing , loaded it and it froze my computer after giving instructions in Chinese ...Apr 07, 2026
He was disatched by Lowes Extended Warranty - Came, diagnosed the issue, ordered the part and made an appointment to return. He didn't comne back and...Apr 06, 2026
Good Morning Dear Receiver, Congratulations Compliment of the season It's Javier Olivan from facebook It gives me great pleasure to inform you...Apr 07, 2026
They are on the doordash website and app also the instacart website and app once you pay your money and try to contact the actual business they will...Apr 07, 2026
You and your spouse or partner are cordially invited to rake part in the El Cajon Travel &Adventure Show. In exchange for your time and opinion...Apr 07, 2026
Sent message to call Apple Store at the number given but answered Microsoft then when I told him the message I had he said hold and same person came...1 Reports
Hi NAME, this is Alexis from Ignition Financial. I see that you recently requested a loan for 30000. I was able to get you pre-approved. Do you have...21 Reports
Reported details
Deceptive and Contradictory Return Policy:
Upon reviewing their refund policy, I found contradictions and misleading terms that make it nearly impossible for a customer to receive a refund:
1. Unclear Risk-Free Guarantee: The company’s marketing suggests a hassle-free return policy, but in reality, they refuse refunds for comfort-related issues, which is not clearly disclosed at the time of purchase.
2. Impossible Return Conditions: Their policy states that returns are only accepted if the item is unworn and unused, yet they also require customers to make a “genuine effort” to apply the lashes before requesting a refund. This creates an unfair loophole where customers must try the product but then become ineligible for a refund because it is no longer “unused.”
3. Vague Refund Criteria: The company selectively determines eligibility for refunds on a case-by-case basis, allowing them to deny most claims under the guise of “application-related concerns.”
Why This is Fraudulent:
• The company misrepresents its return policy by marketing it as a risk-free 30-day trial while burying key exclusions in fine print.
• The terms make it impossible to meet refund criteria, forcing customers to keep a product they cannot use.
• Their advertising is deceptive, luring in consumers with false guarantees.